Study on Residual Stress Relief and Shape Accuracy Retention of Titanium Alloy Parts
-
摘要: 将真空去应力退火、深冷处理和高低温循环热处理进行组合,对航天器结构产品中常用的TC4 R态钛合金典型样件开展残余应力消除试验,并采用X射线衍射法对样件进行残余应力测量,计算处理后样件内部和表面残余应力的平均消除率,最后对处理后样件进行形状精度检测,验证各种热处理方法对形状精度保持性的效果。结果表明,真空去应力退火最为有效,深冷处理次之,高低温循环热处理效果最差,残余应力平均消除率的大小和形状精度保持性的好坏呈强正相关性。相对于未经处理的样件,经真空去应力退火+深冷处理+高低温循环热处理样件的内部/表面残余应力平均消除率和形状精度保持性最高,经真空去应力退火+高低温循环热处理样件的次之,经深冷处理+高低温循环热处理样件的再次之,只经高低温循环热处理样件的最低。Abstract: Residual stress relief tests are carried out on typical TC4 R state titanium alloy commonly used in spacecraft structural products by vacuum stress relief annealing, cryogenic treatment, and high and low temperature cyclic heat treatment. X-ray diffraction method is used to measure residual stress in the specimens, and the average residual stress relief rates inside and in the surface of the treated specimens are calculated. Finally, the shape accuracies of the treated specimens are tested, and the effectiveness of various heat treatment methods in maintaining shape accuracy is verified. The results show that the vacuum stress relief annealing is the most effective, followed by cryogenic treatment, and that the effectiveness of high and low temperature cyclic heat treatment is the lowest. The average residual stress relief rate is strongly positively correlated with the shape accuracy retention. Of all the specimens treated by different methods, the average residual stress relief rates in the internal/surface of specimens treated with the combination of vacuum stress relief annealing, cryogenic treatment, and high and low temperature cycle heat treatment in queue are the highest, and their shape accuracy retention the best, those of the specimens treated with cryogenic treatment and high and low temperature cycle heat treatment come in second, and those of the specimens only treated with high and low temperature cyclic heat treatment rank last.
-
Key words:
- titanium alloy /
- residual stress /
- shape accuracy retention /
- heat treatment /
- x-ray diffraction method
-
[1] 马聪.火星探测遥感相机支撑结构设计[D].长春:中国科学院大学(中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所), 2018. [2] 祁俊峰,季禹曈,张天驰,等.面向航天器多分支钛合金支承结构的SLM成型工艺[J].新技术新工艺, 2018(6):1-5. [3] 吴宏宇,王春洁,丁宗茂,等.着陆姿态不确定下的着陆器缓冲机构优化设计[J].宇航学报, 2018, 39(12):1323-1331. [4] 姜建堂,孟金奎,董亚波,等.大型复杂构件制造过程残余应力演化与调控[J].宇航学报, 2020, 41(6):676-685. [5] 米谷茂.残余应力的产生和对策[M].朱荆璞,邵会孟,译.北京:机械工业出版社, 1983. [6] 何伟,杜小平,马红征,等. TC4钛合金相变温度的测定与分析[J].理化检验(物理分册), 2014, 50(7):461-464. [7] 黎文献,龚浩然,柏振海,等.金属材料的深冷处理[J].材料导报, 2000, 14(3):16-18. [8] 康超,曾卫东,张尧武,等.真空去应力退火对TC21钛合金残余应力的影响[J].热加工工艺, 2011, 40(16):154-156.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 51
- HTML全文浏览量: 10
- PDF下载量: 10
- 被引次数: 0