Study on Strength and Toughness Testing of 45 Steel Based on Continuous Ball Indentation Method
-
摘要: 为研究在役设备的材料强度与韧性测试评价问题,针对工程中常用材料45钢,采用连续球压痕方法,获取了材料的屈服强度、抗拉强度与断裂韧性,通过与常规力学性能试验结果比较,对该方法的可靠性进行了验证。通过研究球压头下压产生的塑性功,与冲击启裂能及断裂韧性之间的关联关系,建立基于仪器化球压痕测试技术的冲击韧性估算评估方法。试验结果表明,利用连续球压痕方法获取的屈服强度、抗拉强度与实际结果的偏差均小于10%,断裂韧性值与试验结果的偏差为12.3%,计算结果在试验值偏差数据范围内。利用连续球压痕技术,建立的断裂韧性与冲击韧性之间的关联公式,所预测的冲击韧性结果与仪器化冲击试验值具有较好的一致性,为在役设备材料的韧性快速评价提供了有效的测试方法。Abstract: In order to study the testing and evaluation of material strength and toughness of in-service equipment, the continuous ball indentation method is used to obtain the yield strength, tensile strength and fracture toughness of 45 steel, which is commonly used in engineering. The reliability of the method was verified by comparing the results with those of the conventional mechanical property test. By studying the relationship between the plastic work produced by the downward pressure of the ball head and the impact crack initiation energy and fracture toughness, the impact toughness estimation method based on instrumented ball indentation test technology is established. The results show that the deviations between the yield strength and tensile strength obtained by the continuous ball indentation method and the actual results are less than 10%, and the deviation between the fracture toughness value and the experimental result is 12.3%. The calculated results are all within the acceptable deviations of experimental values. Based on the correlation formula between fracture toughness and impact toughness established by continuous ball indentation technique, the predicted impact toughness results are in good agreement with the values from the instrumented impact test. This provides an effective method for rapid evaluation of toughness of in-service equipment materials.
-
Key words:
- 45 steel /
- continuous ball indentation /
- mechanical property /
- fracture toughness /
- impact toughness
-
[1] 王军. 无损探伤技术在钢结构检测中的应用[J]. 化工设计通讯, 2020, 46(7):138-139. [2] JEON J Y, KIM Y J, LEE M Y, et al. Fracture toughness prediction of aged CF8M using small punch test[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2015, 38(12):1456-1465. [3] 耿卫民. 焊接接头的微型剪切试验[J]. 焊接技术, 2017, 46(6):21-23. [4] 孙明成, 张超群, 韩德斌, 等. 球形压痕表征应力应变法测金属材料的力学性能[J]. 机械工程材料, 2017, 41(9):106-110. [5] PATIL D C, DAS M, DAS G, et al. Evaluating the mechanical properties of HPT processed aluminium alloys using automated ball-indentation technique[J]. Procedia Materials Science, 2014, 5:379-386. [6] 汤杰, 王威强, 苏成功, 等. 连续球压痕法测试压力容器钢力学性能的研究[J]. 振动测试与诊断, 2015, 35(2):281-288. [7] 张国新, 王威强, 王尚. Q345R钢板断裂韧度的自动球压痕试验测算研究[J]. 机电一体化, 2017, 23(6):23-29. [8] 魏中坤, 伍声宝, 关凯书. 球压痕法评价16MnR钢的断裂韧性[J]. 机械工程材料, 2016, 40(1):32-34. [9] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 金属材料拉伸试验第1部分:室温试验方法:GB/T 228.1-2010[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2011. [10] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 金属材料准静态断裂韧度的统一试验方法:GB/T 21143-2014[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2015. [11] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 金属材料夏比摆锤冲击试验方法:GB/T 229-2007[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2008. [12] 国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 金属材料夏比V型缺口摆锤冲击试验仪器化试验方法:GB/T 19748-2019[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2019. [13] HAGGAG F M. Field indentation microprobe for str-uctural integrity evaluation:US4852397. 1989-08-01. [14] 伍声宝, 徐彤, 喻灿, 等. 采用球压痕法测16MnR钢的拉伸性能[J]. 机械工程材料, 2015, 39(1):82-85. [15] ZHANG T R, WANG S, WANG W Q. A comparative study on fracture toughness calculation models in spherical indentation tests (SITs) for ductile metals[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2019, 160:114-128. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 178
- HTML全文浏览量: 93
- PDF下载量: 27
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
