CHEN Qing-lei. Difference of the Impact Test Result Obtained by Charpy Pendulum Impact Carried by Methods of the National Standard and American Standard[J]. Development and Application of Materials, 2014, 29(3): 66-69. DOI: 10.19515/j.cnki.1003-1545.2014.03.014
Citation: CHEN Qing-lei. Difference of the Impact Test Result Obtained by Charpy Pendulum Impact Carried by Methods of the National Standard and American Standard[J]. Development and Application of Materials, 2014, 29(3): 66-69. DOI: 10.19515/j.cnki.1003-1545.2014.03.014

Difference of the Impact Test Result Obtained by Charpy Pendulum Impact Carried by Methods of the National Standard and American Standard

More Information
  • Received Date: December 30, 2013
  • Available Online: March 19, 2024
  • The difference between the national standard and American standard of charpy pendulum impact test has been investigated. Testing results indicate that the similar results can be obtained by the two methods when the impact absorbing energy is low. However, the impact properties obtained by ASTM E23-07a are higher than that of GB/T 229-2007 in case of high impact absorbing energy. This is mainly caused by difference in impact blade radius. A small plastic deformation will be occur when the contact area between impact blade and impact testing specimen is small, leading to a lower expansion and impact absorbing energy. Conversely, a big plastic deformation will be occur in case of big contact area between impact blade and impact testing specimen, causing a higher expansion and impact absorbing energy. The two methods of national standard and American standard have the same nominal size for specimen but quite different in machining deviation. Compared with national standard, the machining deviation requirement of American standard is stricter.
  • Related Articles

    [1]GAO Yuhao, WANG Jia, WU Zepeng, CHEN Pei, ZHAI Jianfei. Study on Crack Curvature Correction Method in Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Test[J]. Development and Application of Materials, 2023, 38(2): 10-15.
    [2]XUE Gang. Consistency Analysis of I1 and K Criterions for Linear Elastic Fracture of Plane Strain Mode I Crack Subjected to Bidirectional Equal Tensile Stress[J]. Development and Application of Materials, 2023, 38(1): 1-8.
    [3]HE Wei, MA Hongzheng, MIAO Zhuang, BAI Xinfang. Analysis on Fracture Cause for Titanium Alloy Ti6Al4V Screw[J]. Development and Application of Materials, 2022, 37(6): 124-128.
    [4]GAO Zhenpeng, XUE Gang, ZHANG Yunhao, GONG Xuhui, NIU Jiajia. Analysis on Relationship Between Tensile Property Parameters and Nil-ductility Transition Temperature of Crack Arrest Thick Steel Plate[J]. Development and Application of Materials, 2020, 35(6): 1-6.
    [5]WANG Renfu, DENG Wanping, NIU Jicheng. Effect of Plastic Deformation and Stress Relief Heat Treatment on Microstructure and Properties of 10CrNi5MoV Steel Plate[J]. Development and Application of Materials, 2019, 34(5): 16-21,26. DOI: 10.19515/j.cnki.1003-1545.2019.05.004
    [6]XUE Gang, WANG Tao, YANG Chaofei, NIU Jiajia, NIU Jicheng. Research on Hydrogen Induced Cracking Mechanism of Ferritic Steel in Welding Process Based on I1 Fracture Criterion[J]. Development and Application of Materials, 2018, 33(4): 49-52. DOI: 10.19515/j.cnki.1003-1545.2018.04.009
    [7]GONG Xu-hui, WANG Yu, XUE Gang. Investigation on Tensile Behavior of TC21 Titanium Alloy at Intermediate Strain Rate[J]. Development and Application of Materials, 2013, 28(2): 8-13,29. DOI: 10.19515/j.cnki.1003-1545.2013.02.002
    [8]ZHANG Haifeng, LI Xuefeng, ZHANG Yonghui. Failure Analysis of Cracking of Nut[J]. Development and Application of Materials, 2013, 28(1): 72-75. DOI: 10.19515/j.cnki.1003-1545.2013.01.016
    [9]YANG Guang, XUE Gang, WANG Ren-fu, GONG Xu-hui. The Calculation of Plastic Component of CTOD Inconsideration of Crack Extension[J]. Development and Application of Materials, 2012, 27(2): 77-79. DOI: 10.19515/j.cnki.1003-1545.2012.02.018
    [10]LI Xue-feng, WANG Chun-fen. Analysis on Crack of Roll Axis[J]. Development and Application of Materials, 2012, 27(2): 73-76. DOI: 10.19515/j.cnki.1003-1545.2012.02.017

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (56) PDF downloads (3) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return